Last Updated: December 27, 2011 11:15am ET

1 comment

The Science of Real Estate

San Francisco Building Due Diligence

For those transacting or financing real estate in San Francisco, there are several things to consider about the condition of your asset that are unique to the City by the Bay.  These items should be identified and addressed with a thorough Seismic Risk Assessment/Probable Maximum Loss and Property Condition Assessment. 

 

Seismic Risk Assessments/PMLs in San Francisco

As with most earthquake prone areas, buildings in San Francisco should undergo a Seismic Risk Assessment or “Probable Maximum Loss” report to rate the building for seismic risk.  It’s no secret that San Francisco is synonymous with earthquakes as the area is home to many known seismic fault lines.  To make matters worse, much of the city sits on soil with a high liquefaction coefficient and when it starts shaking, the soil basically becomes like liquid and the buildings can actually sink or tilt.  You will see steps from the sidewalk go down to the building entry door where the door was once at street level.

 

After the devastating damaged caused by the earthquakes of 1906 and 1989, the city has adopted some strict guidelines with respect to structural design of new buildings as well as strengthening older buildings, more specifically, unreinforced masonry buildings.  Most brick buildings built prior to the early 1930s have no reinforcing steel.  These are among the first to topple during an earthquake.  The city now requires all unreinforced masonry buildings be retrofitted. 

 

Since most of the city is on a hill and street parking is limited, many older buildings have parking garages at the first floor of the building, creating what is called a “soft story”.  The garage door openings limit the amount of shear wall space available making these buildings vulnerable to collapse.   Buildings such as these should be strengthened by installing rigid steel frames at the garage door openings.  This retrofit might be recommended subsequent to a Probable Maximum Loss (PML) report.

 

One aspect unique to San Francisco is that many older buildings were constructed with a zero lot line.  This means that they abut the adjacent buildings with no more than a few inches between them.   During an earthquake, the buildings will start banging into each other introducing additional lateral forces.  This is referred to as “pounding” and can be overlooked when considering the lateral stability of a structure.

 

The engineer inspecting the property should investigate the presence of these conditions to accurately analyze the structures ability to resist all lateral forces with minimal damage.  To learn more about Seismic Risk Assessments/PMLs, check out this free Globe Street webinar.

 

San Francisco Property Condition Reports

Property Condition Reports are used to assess the condition of the building and long and short term maintenance costs, and in San Francisco there are a few unique things to keep a look out for.  Many buildings in San Francisco are listed in the local, State and National Historic Registers.  The exterior facades of these buildings must be maintained in their original design and improvements are basically limited to restoring the original appearance.  A Property Condition Report should identify any building listed as historic at the city, state, or national level as future renovation or repair work will be impacted by the historical status and closely scrutinized by the building department.   

 

San Francisco is one of the few cities on the west coast to offer steam service throughout the downtown area.  Many older buildings were heated by steam boilers and radiators.  Rather that replace boilers, many property owners now purchase steam from the city.  The building inspector doing the Property Condition Report should investigate the source of any outside utility service rather than assume that the old boiler has failed and requires replacement.

 

Finally, San Francisco is very wet.  The salt air, fog and rain will corrode anything that is not maintained or protected.  This can shorten the remaining useful life of many items like exterior paint and plaster; metal roofing or siding; metal windows and doors; metal flashings, railings and certainly any rooftop mechanical equipment exposed to the elements.   Any exterior element left unprotected will eventually corrode, fail, and in possibly allow for water intrusion into the building.  Any such condition should be considered an immediate concern. 

 

 

(To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.)

For more on engineering on GlobeSt.com, check out Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.'s "Science of Real Estate" blog, which provides Thought Leadership positions on a variety of commercial real estate-related issues. Be sure to check out Partner's on-demand webinar on March 21 titled Engineering Returns Through Energy Efficiency.

Comments+ Add your comment

Posted by Seismicguy

Nice write-up. This also applies to any area of moderate to high seismic hzards. It should be noted that the ASTM E2026 documents REQUIRES the reviewing engineer to determine the Building Stability (i.e. collapse potential) for all Seismic Risk Assessment reports. Mearly opining on the PML is not sufficient.
-Seismic Guy

December 28, 2011 at 11:41 AM EDT #

Post your comment

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Log in

If you have already registered to GlobeSt.com, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

About Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.

Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is a full-service environmental and engineering consulting firm completing projects nationwide. We specialize in evaluating properties in connection with real estate transactions, development or management.

Advertisement

Featured Video

Everything You Need to Know About PMLs