Last Updated: November 1, 2011 06:57pm ET

1 comment

StreetSmart

Global Fears Overshadow U.S. Economic Strength

The last batch of critical U.S. economic indicators has gone a long way to alleviate worst-case scenario concerns regarding the U.S. economy. Even amid the worst of the recent turmoil triggered largely by the U.S. debt downgrade in August, the private sector kept adding a modest number of jobs, retail sales increased and manufacturing regained some strength. These factors culminated in a better-than-expected reading in U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 2.5% during the third quarter. All of these factors combined confirm that the U.S. economy remains on strong footing and far from recession, even though it lacks any measurable forward momentum. 

Last week’s encouraging progress by the European Union (EU) to provide a more systemic solution to its debt problems was a welcome sign, spurring significant gains in global equity markets. The fragile state of EU’s fiscal conditions was on display already as a potential referendum by Greece threatens to unwind last week’s proposed solutions. Not only does this cloud impact Europe’s consumer and business confidence, banking industry and capitals markets, it directly impacts the United States in measurable ways.  The EU, the largest economic region in the world with total output of approximately $16 trillion, accounts for 18% of U.S. exports. U.S. exports have been a bright spot economically, growing by 7% to 8% a year and accounting for approximately 13% of total economic output in the United States. At a time when residential investment only accounts for 2% of economic output due to lingering problems in the for-sale housing market, exports play an even more critical role than usual. A recession in Europe would certainly put a dent in our export numbers and broader economy. Psychologically, many U.S. multi-national firms have been holding back on expansion and hiring plans partly due to uncertainty in Europe and a practical resolution to Europe’s debt problems would most likely release some pent-up demand, which is badly needed globally – and particularly – here in the U.S.

Given the unpredictable nature of current dynamics, commercial real estate investors are well served to reassess market realities. The good news is that our domestic economy is holding up well through some strong headwinds. Fundamentally, demand for space should be entering a natural recovery cycle but is being held back by fear and uncertainty.  The odds of a severe recession have declined even more in the past 30 days. Now, the most probable economic scenario through 2012 is a painfully gradual recovery with job growth of 1.2% to 1.5%. This is certainly not enough to generate large volumes of demand for commercial properties, but it should be sufficient to keep the recent improvements in occupancies on track. By the end of 2012, two major clouds should break: 1) The election cycle should at least reduce if not break the political paralysis in the United States, and 2) The EU is likely to work out some version of the proposal it announced last week. Should these events occur, the pace of growth moving into 2013 would rise substantially.

In the meantime, low interest rates and a preference for high-quality, low-risk assets are safety nets leveraged by active commercial property investors. Given the ongoing volatility in the stock market and high degree of uncertainty, global demand for hard-asset investments is likely to increase, bringing more capital into U.S. commercial real estate. As I have suggested in past blogs, the yield compression in the upper tier of the market is already starting to push capital into Class B, value-add and secondary market investments. However, the capital migration to higher-risk assets is still cautious and gradual, and will remain so. Tertiary markets and lower-quality assets will continue to lag in a cautiously improving investment market.

 

Hessam Nadji is senior vice president and managing director of Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services. He is also the interim managing director of Institutional Property Advisors, Marcus & Millichap's special division designed to serve the unique needs of institutional and major private multifamily investors. Contact him at hnadji@ipausa.com.

 

(To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.)

For more thought leadership from Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, check out "StreetSmart," a blog by Hessam Nadji, the firm's managing director of research and advisory services. The blog provides Thought Leadership positions on a variety of commercial real estate-related issues. Click here to watch Nadji on CNBC's "Realty Check" program talking about multifamily and the housing crash. For more information on the Thought Leadership program, contact Scott Thompson at sthompson@alm.com.

Comments+ Add your comment

Posted by Kirk Cypel

Mr. Nadji presents a favorable and well-considered view. At the macroeconomic level, there are a number of generally positive and encouraging signs. But what about interest rates? Given today's cap rates, what would a 1% increase in borrowing costs would do to prices? Although there a few "moving parts" to the analysis, it seems that - to keep equity returns stable - a 1% increase in rates could depress prices in the range of 7% to 10% (this assumes that with increased competition for capital investors would not require higher returns than the current market). But today's 10 year is at 2%. Is a 5% ten-year bond unrealistic? From another perspective, we need to question whether restored confidence is sufficient to restore health to the real estate markets. Some basic paradigm shifts are changing the way real estate is used. Macro economic factors have overshadowed these micro economic, or "market," developments. For example:
Changes in retail sales channels have given rise to the demise of the "big book store" (e.g., Borders), they threaten electronics retailers. There are changes in the way that groceries are being sold -- Costco and Sam's Club has already caused shifts, Walmart and Target are creating new challenges -- the unionized local supermarket chain (not exactly a retailer that has shown historically an innovative approach to doing business) is facing new competitive pressures. To the real estate investor, these changes represent the potential for changes in the neighborhood shopping center, in the use, design and efficiency of those centers. There are changes in the office sector. Sales offices are closing and allowing staff to work from home. When an office meeting is required, the company rents a conference room at a Marriott. Tenants are leaving the marketplace. Remaining tenants are changing their office standards. Where executives formerly had 3 windows in their offices, employers will now give them smaller offices with only 2 windows. Employers are cramming more people into the same amount of space. Office RFPs reflect higher parking requirements, most of our CBDs are substantially under parked (although a lovely dream, public transportation is not resolving the issue in many markets). So what's the point? Setting interest rates aside, there is reason to question whether we are navigating a paradigm shift in how commercial real estate is being used. Stated another way, although we see some positive macro economic changes, there's reason to believe that micro economic factors (market factors) are being overlooked that the the demand curve for real estate is changing. With greatest respect for Mr. Nadji, who has probably forgotten more about real estate economics than I will ever know, I continue to read that the issues facing real estate are a function of confidence and that, once confidence is restored, real estate will flourish. Today's pricing is already ahead of economics and the only way that some buyers can pay the prices that they're putting on the table today is to assume a set of future leasing economics (rates and absorption) that are fairly speculative. It's questionable whether buyers are being compensated for the risks that they're assuming today. Fact is, for whatever reason, our real estate markets never underwent a full correction to reflect the depth of the country's economic crisis. With the current prospects for growth, changes in real estate microeconomics, and the likely direction of interest rates; real estate investors face some real dangers. Proceed with caution.

November 09, 2011 at 09:44 AM EDT #

Post your comment

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Log in

If you have already registered to GlobeSt.com, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

About Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services

Since 1971, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services has been the premier provider of investment real estate services. Through the depth of its local market knowledge, the firm has established itself as a leading investment real estate company with more than 1,200 agents nationwide. The firm recently formed Institutional Property Advisors (IPA), a multifamily brokerage division serving the unique needs of major private and institutional investors.