Daley Vows More Challenges to Tax Reductions

"I've worked hard to keep our neighborhoods affordable for people of every background and income, yet recent decisions by the Property Tax Appeal Board work against that goal and benefit mainly large corporations," says Daley in a statement, who has sent a resolution to the city council.

Not only is 2003 a mayoral election year, but the city suddenly finds itself facing a cash crunch.

Attorney James D. Regan, whose firm specializes in appeals, tells GlobeSt.com he doubts the measures will have much effect. Even the administration concedes that the threat of a challenge could put the brake on the amount of the reduction sought by owners. Regan notes the effort appears aimed largely at Downtown office properties, where a $1-million reduction in an assessment is relatively slight.

For instance, the Sears Tower's assessed value is $177.9 million—or a market value of $468 million—and carries a tax bill of $30.8 million. The Aon building at 200 E. Randolph St. ($115 million assessed value, $19.9 million tax bill) and the Mercantile Exchange towers at 10 and 30 S. Wacker Dr. ($105.4 million assessed value, $18.3 million tax bill) also carry nine-figure assessments.

Regan also notes the city already has the right to weigh in on owners' attempts to lower their tax bills, adding the Chicago Public Schools frequently intervenes at hearings.

The current tax system has given the Aon building a $302.6-million market value, even though it changed hands for $431 million in 1999. Nonetheless, building owners and operators note that property taxes are roughly the same here as they are in New York City, where higher rents more than offset the somewhat higher operating expenses.

Daley also is asking for a two-year moratorium in Property Tax Appeal Board action while the state legislature carves out a new property tax appeals system. And the mayor is not ignoring cries from officials including current Cook County Assessor James M. Houlihan, who have long noted the system generally puts heavier burden on commercial property tax payers as opposed to those who own residential properties with up to six units.

Residential property up to six units are assessed at—at least in theory—16% of market value. Meanwhile, owners of retail and office property are assessed at 38% of market value, while industrial property is assessed at 36%. Beginning at seven units, larger multifamily properties are assessed at 33%.

In every other county in Illinois, assessments are theoretically at 33% regardless of the property type.

"It's much more complicated than they want to make it," observes Regan, who worked in the assessor's office under Thomas Hynes. He also has served on Houlihan's tax forum.