As federal immigration enforcement intensifies under the Trump Administration, multifamily property owners are increasingly finding themselves caught in an unexpected crossfire. Landlords across the country are now receiving demands from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for comprehensive resident information – requests that frequently blur the lines between immigration enforcement and housing privacy rights.
These demands, often arriving as administrative subpoenas seeking everything from lease agreements to personal identification documents, present apartment owners and managers with a complex legal dilemma: how to navigate federal immigration requests while protecting resident privacy and avoiding potential legal liability. The stakes are high, as compliance could violate multiple federal or state privacy statutes, while non-compliance might trigger federal enforcement action.
When a multifamily landlord or manager receives a demand from ICE to share private information about a community’s residents, it is essential that this situation be handled carefully and legally. Here are the key steps landlords should quickly implement.
Do Not Comply Immediately
Resist the inclination to disclose resident information or hand over documents right away. Even if the paperwork provided is “official looking” or appears to be from someone with authority to make the request, the obligation to comply with the demand must be evaluated by competent and experienced legal counsel. The enforceability of these subpoenas or other demands can be questionable if not issued under judicial oversight.
Establish Clear Policies for Management Companies
Landlords should establish and communicate to management companies, employees and other personnel working at their apartment communities clear policies on how to manage ICE demands, including the protocol for verifying requests and engaging legal counsel. Management companies should be required (pursuant to their management agreements or other directives issued by property owners) to comply with these policies.
Verify the Legitimacy of the Request
Review all paperwork to confirm that the demand is legitimate and issued by an authorized governmental party. Subpoenas should generally be issued under the authority of a judge, not just an immigration officer. Any other form of verbal or written requests or demands should be treated with suspicion and should be verified by an attorney.
Contact Qualified Legal Counsel Immediately
Engage one or more attorneys that are experienced in immigration law, federal and state privacy laws, and fair housing laws. This might require a team of legal resources that has all the needed areas of expertise. Ask this team to assess the validity of the demand and provide needed guidance about the appropriate legal response.
If the communities facing these demands have residents that are particularly vulnerable, consider taking steps right now to identify the legal counsel comprising this team so that they can be contacted for assistance immediately. Time is critical in these situations and delays in properly responding to these demands may lead to additional complications.
Assess Enforceability of Subpoena
Administrative subpoenas that lack judicial oversight or seem legally questionable may not be enforceable and landlords have the right to challenge them in court. Before complying with any subpoena’s disclosure requirements, obtain the advice of an attorney to determine the best course of action.
Narrow the Scope Where Possible
Collaborate with counsel to challenge overly broad requests. Push back on fishing expedition wholesale demands for complete resident files, or all footage from security or doorbell cameras. Question requests for information about “other household members” that are not specifically named in the subpoena.
Assess Legal Exposure in Disclosures
Consider Fair Credit Reporting Action implications of disclosing resident files containing credit reports. Review federal and state privacy laws, including the Privacy Act of 1974, to determine if compliance with the subpoena might violate these legal requirements. Assess potential Fair Housing Act consequences of required disclosures. Check constitutional protections and defenses that may be available to defend against the requested disclosures.
Review Contractual and Legal Obligations
Examine all leasing documentation, including lease agreements, to identify confidentiality and privacy clauses. Determine whether it may be beneficial to update certain clauses on a going forward basis, or whether it may be beneficial to develop policies regarding the collection or retention of documentation maintained. Also consider whether any fiduciary obligations are owed to residents under state law. Sharing private resident information without consent might breach a landlord’s contractual obligations or violate a resident’s rights under laws such as the Fair Housing Act.
Protective Measures
Protect Sensitive Information. Review all resident files and information to identify which documents contain the most sensitive private data, such as employment history and family relationships. Consider whether any of the requested information falls under an attorney-client privilege or other protection. Consider whether information pertinent to minors or immigration status may require additional protection.
Document Everything. Maintain detailed records of all communications with federal agents. Save voicemails, emails and copies of all documents received. Keep a timeline of all relevant events. Document any legal advice received and actions taken in response to the demand.
Communicate with Residents. Consult with legal counsel before notifying affected residents about ICE demands so that you can develop a complete understanding of your obligations and limitations concerning those communications. Balance objectives to be transparent with legal strategy considerations. It may or may not be advisable to inform residents immediately about ICE subpoenas and other demands. If residents flee for fear of being detained, or if they are detained, landlords and residents alike may be impacted financially and suffer additional impacts because of enforcement activities. Therefore, when there is no subpoena or demand activity, Landlords may want to provide thoughtful communications in advance of such activity to advise residents of their rights and the steps landlords will take to protect their privacy, if appropriate.
To minimize multiple ICE visits at your premises, you may want to communicate to residents that they may seek qualified legal advice on related matters such as whether residents must answer questions from ICE regarding the whereabouts of residents or neighbors, or when or if they must consent to a search of their home or allow an ICE officer into their home.
The goal of these communications is to balance the protection of the landlord’s business interests and the privacy rights of residents while complying with valid legal demands. Each situation is unique and should be analyzed in detail, particularly in light of the rapidly evolving legal landscape in this area. Competent legal guidance is essential. It is critical that landlords stay informed and updated about developments in immigration laws and privacy regulations that may affect the landlord’s compliance obligations and the residents’ rights.
Pam Rothenberg (pam.rothenberg@wbd-us.com) is a Partner in the Real Estate Practice Group at Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP and routinely represents owners and managers of apartment communities in her commercial real estate practice. Lynn O’Brien (Lynn.OBrien@wbd-us.com) serves as Womble Bond Dickinson’s Immigration Practice Leader and regularly counsels business clients in complex immigration matters.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.