Private capital has pulled decisively ahead of institutions as the dominant force in prime commercial real estate, reshaping who calls the shots in core markets from London to Asia, according to Knight Frank's 2026 Wealth Report. The report finds that private capital, including private equity and high-net-worth wealth, has accounted for the largest share of global commercial deal activity for the past five years, confirming a structural power shift that many institutional investors are now being forced to price in rather than resist.
The scale of the move is stark. In Knight Frank's first Wealth Report in 2007, high-net-worth investors allocated just 2.6% of their total asset portfolios to commercial real estate, with the overwhelming focus on residential holdings. By 2023, that share had jumped to 21% of investable wealth in directly owned commercial property, based on the firm's global Attitudes Survey – an almost order-of-magnitude reweighting in less than two decades.
For CRE investors, the implication is clear: private money is no longer the marginal buyer competing at the edges of the bid sheet; it is increasingly the reference purchasers and price-setters across key markets.
A Long-Predicted Shift Becomes Market Structure
Knight Frank's researchers argue that this outcome was not accidental: from its earliest editions, the Wealth Report forecast that private capital would emerge as a dominant force in CRE and the 2026 report argues that this thesis has now been fully validated.
The inflection was visible in London almost a decade ago, when two Chinese buyers each sought to deploy more than £1 billion into a single iconic tower, only to end up acquiring 20 Fenchurch Street and the Leadenhall Building after the owners of The Shard refused to sell. Those transactions, brokered by Knight Frank's capital markets team, are cited as a turning point, after which it became difficult to deny that private investors were setting the pace in the world's prime office markets.
Behind those headline deals lies a significant shift in the profile and behavior of wealthy investors. When Knight Frank first sized global wealth cohorts in 2008, there were an estimated 373,000 HNWIs in mainland China, versus 3.1 million in the US.
Two decades on, the focus at the top of the market has shifted to ultra-high-net-worth individuals: more than 121,000 UHNWIs in mainland China and just over 251,000 in the US now sit on capital pools large enough to swing prime CRE markets in their own right.
That expansion has been underpinned by a more than 600% increase in China's GDP over the past 20 years, which has multiplied both the sources and destinations of outbound capital and accelerated cross-border flows into commercial assets.
For private owners already active in CRE, Knight Frank's data confirms what many have experienced anecdotally: this is no longer a niche club of trophy-seekers. The weight of wealth in the system – and the speed at which it can be mobilized – is turning private capital into a structural counterparty, especially in cycles where traditional institutions pull back.
From Trophy Hobbyists to Professional Allocators
The report also stresses that the rise of private capital is not just about "more money," but about a wholesale professionalization of how that is deployed. Knight Frank's Private Office team notes that two decades ago, wealthy families often approached CRE through one-off, interest-driven plays – a hotel acquisition here, a luxury retail asset there – which were as much about personal affinity as portfolio construction.
Today, those same families are more likely to operate through formal private offices that recruit from the ranks of major wealth advisory and property investment firms and that make decisions within a defined strategic framework.
According to the Wealth Report, this has changed how private investors view commercial real estate: the "emotional pull" of owning landmark buildings remains, but it is now coupled with a clearer focus on CRE's role in delivering long-running income, offering scope for enhancement and repurposing and providing a measure of liquidity relative to other real assets.
That recalibration is also altering risk appetite and entry timing. Knight Frank highlights how, by the final quarter of 2009 – barely a year after the global financial crisis had roiled markets – HNWIs were already moving back into CRE as capital values rebounded, with annual growth in the asset class recovering to almost 9% according to IPD data.
The firm's researchers point to this episode as an early example of private investors using flexible firepower and higher risk tolerance to step in when more constrained capital sources were still sidelined.
For CRE investors, one of the more notable angles in the report is how private buyers now frame property relative to other asset classes. Knight Frank's capital markets specialists say these investors are increasingly attuned to CRE's lower volatility relative to equities and to its potential as an inflation hedge, while bond coupons remain fixed, rents can be reset higher over time, preserving real income and value if assets are bought at the right basis. That dynamic has been a recurring theme during recent interest rate volatility.
Private Money in the Gap Left by Institutions
The Wealth Report argues that the most recent rate cycle has reinforced private capital's growing role. As policy rates jumped from the ultra-low environment that prevailed from 2009 through 2022, traditional core buyers of London offices – institutions, sovereign wealth funds and private equity funds – stepped back or slowed deployment. In that window, private individuals and family offices remained notably active, according to Knight Frank's dealmakers, using their ability to make quick decisions and tap a wider mix of capital sources to secure assets that no longer pencil for more rigid mandate-driven buyers.
This same pattern echoes the post-crisis period. Knight Frank tracks a sharp rise in private capital invested in CRE from just under US$42 billion in 2009 to almost US$71 billion in 2011, as wealthy buyers accelerated into the market while others were still rebuilding their underwriting frameworks.
For investors reading the 2026 report, the takeaway is that private capital has now demonstrated its willingness and capacity to be pro‑cyclical, leaning into dislocation rather than waiting for stability and consensus pricing.
The firm's commentators argue that the structural features of private money underpin this behavior. Private investors typically face fewer reporting constraints, greater direct control over strategy and a wider range of debt and equity options than many institutional funds, allowing them to move faster when conviction is high.
That combination, together with increasing investment sophistication, leaves them better placed to exploit cycles in global property markets than some of the traditional gatekeepers of institutional capital, Knight Frank concludes.
For CRE players, this has competitive consequences: in many markets, the marginal buyer setting clearing prices in stressed or transitional situations is now as likely to be a private office as a fund, which may compress the window to act when pricing finally looks attractive.
What the New Order Means for CRE Investors
Looking back at the first Wealth Report, Knight Frank suggests that investors who heeded early warnings about commercial property's potential have been rewarded. The report notes that a hypothetical investor who entered the London market when the inaugural edition flagged CRE's prospects would have seen strong performance, including through downturns, when income continued to flow even as values cycled.
The 2026 edition's core message for commercial investors is not that institutions are disappearing from the landscape, but that private wealth has emerged as an anchor buyer whose influence is likely to persist. With more UHNWIs in key economies, increasingly sophisticated private offices and a track record of moving first in volatile markets, Knight Frank's research suggests that private capital will remain central to pricing, liquidity and risk transfer in prime commercial real estate over the next cycle.
For investors, that reality demands more than simple awareness; it requires recalibrating strategies around a capital partner that is no longer just "smart money at the edge" but a primary force in the market's core.
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.