Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

SEATTLE, WA-”The activity has dropped dramatically since September 11—almost come to a halt–but the vacancy rates are still a lot lower than in the Kent Valley,” says Vince DeLuca, referring to Seattle’s “close-in” industrial sub-market.

“Things started to slow down significantly about a year ago,” the Colliers broker tells GlobeSt. “They were red-hot until then–with about a one per cent vacancy and virtually nothing for sale.”But following Sept. 11, DeLuca says, “Almost nothing’s going on, like a paralysis.” DeLuca explains, “Leases and purchases (of industrial space) are big capital expenditures, and in an atmosphere of extreme uncertainty, people are not putting their signatures on the line.”

The Seattle broker says there are some breaks in the darkness. Though they have risen above a cramped one percent, Close-in vacancies are still well-within respectable levels–according to third quarter numbers compiled by Colliers’ — running from a low of 0.00% in the Port of Seattle to a high of only 5.86% in West Seattle. And, over the past few weeks DeLuca has had “a trickle of activity” come his way, albeit nothing he would characterize as a shift.

The Close-in market surrounds the city and contains more than 60.5 million sf in the areas of Spokane Street, “close” Seattle North, West Seattle, East Hill, and the Port of Seattle. It measures approximately 80% as large as the Kent Valley’s 74.3-million-sf. The difference in vacancy rates between the two sub-markets is as marked as DeLuca says.

As of September 30, Colliers pegs the average, direct vacancy rate of the Close-in market at 2.13%, with a total rate of 2.49%. In sharp contrast, total vacancy in Kent Valley is nearly four times higher — 9.58%. Of that, 6.19 percentage points are direct.

The difference between the two does not end with vacancy rates—they are exceptionally diverse in character as well. DeLuca says Kent Valley contains newer properties, built mostly in the 1970′s, 1980′s and later. It is an area marked by institutional owners, attracted by its “larger, newer, more homogeneous” buildings.

Conversely, DeLuca says there are very few institutional owners in the Close-in market with its older, stand-alone buildings, the bulk of which were built in the 1950′s and 1960′s. Here owners tend to be more along the lines of local companies with the need for their own warehouse facilities and private investors who, at least for the time being, have the good fortune of having plenty of tenants.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

GlobeSt. NET LEASE Spring 2021Event

This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.

Get More Information


Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.