Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

HOOD RIVER, OR-Cities in Western Oregon are apparently figuring out how to legally keep Wal-Mart out of their communities. In the latest rebuff for the retailing giant, the Oregon Land Use Board of appeals last week upheld a Hood River County decision denying Wal-Mart’s plans to build a new store here because the store would be out of scale with surrounding structures. The denial comes on the heels of denials for Wal-Mart stores in two other northwest Oregon cities, Hillsboro and Oregon City.Wal-Mart wants to replace its existing 75,000-sf store in Hood River with a 186,600-sf superstore. If eventually built, the store would be 17 times larger than any other building in the immediate area. Wal-Mart says it has not yet decided whether to appeal the LUBA decision to the Oregon Court of Appeals.Wal-Mart has not had much success in front of the Oregon Court of Appeals. Earlier this month, it upheld a LUBA decision affirming a City of Hillsboro denial of the retailer’s plans to build its first store in that community. Among other things, LUBA said Wal-Mart failed to produce accurate projections of the traffic impacts of its proposed development and did not explore development alternatives that would have retained two groves of sequoia trees. The building’s lack of windows along one side of the building and the positioning of the loading dock too close to a sidewalk also were mentioned in the board’s decision. Also in July, Oregon City handed down its second rejection of Wal-Mart’s plans in the community. In its first attempt last year, the retailer was not able to obtain the zone change it needed, as the city commissioners voted unanimously to deny it. Four months ago, it filed a new application for a new site in the city that wouldn’t require a zone change, meaning it wouldn’t need approval from either the planning commission or the city commissioners, just administrative approval from community development director Dan Drentlaw. Drentlaw ultimately denied the application, saying the applications were practically identical and, according to city code, an applicant must wait a year before submitting a “substantially similar” proposal. Wal-Mart appealed Drentlaw’s decision to the city commissioners, who upheld the decision. Wal-Mart has not yet appealed that decision to LUBA.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 3 free articles* across the ALM subscription network every 30 days
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.