Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

NEW YORK CITY-The owners of the Stuyvesant Town/Peter Cooper Village multifamily complex say they will appeal last month’s State Supreme Court ruling after the court granted permission to file an appeal. That March 5 ruling by the a four-judge panel in the Appellate Division reinstated a $200-million class action brought by a group of tenants who claimed the owners illegally deregulated their rent-stabilized apartments while continuing to receive J-51 tax abatements from the city.

In a statement, Tishman Speyer Properties and its general partner PCV ST Owner L.P., which bought the complex for $5.4 billion in 2006, say they’re “pleased that the Appellate Division has granted our motion for leave to appeal. We look forward to the Court of Appeals ruling on this important issue.”

The lower-court ruling, if it stands, could require multifamily property owners to refund the difference between market rents and regulated rents, and has spurred concerns that it could lead to citywide defaults on loans. Because the Appellate Division ruling–which overturned a Manhattan Supreme Court judge’s 2007 ruling dismissing the tenant’s action–was unanimous, the decision to allow the Stuyvesant Town owners to appeal had to be unanimous as well, according to published reports.

Attorney Alexander Schmidt of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, who represented the tenants in last month’s ruling, tells GlobeSt.com the decision allowing an appeal “was not entirely unexpected, given the public attention given to this case and the fact that all parties, as well as City government officials, have publicly recognized that obtaining a prompt final ruling on the question of law addressed by the March 5 decision is in the best interests of both landlords and tenants citywide.” He says the court order to allow Stuyvesant Town’s owners to appeal “does not represent a ‘great victory’ for the landlord defendants as some in the press have reported.”

All the order means, says Schmidt, “is that the Court of Appeals will review the March 5 decision promptly. We are very confident that the Appellate Division’s March 5 ruling was correct and that the Court of Appeals will agree.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


Join 1000+ of the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!

Get More Information


Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.