Public interest has been high during the review process, with some 1,500 letters objecting to the chain store as a threat to the area's small businesses and neighborhood character and more than 2,000 in favor of the idea as a way to revitalize the commercial district and restore the vintage structure, which was built in 1928.

Green decided to approve the project on Oct. 10, even though it lacked the mandatory eight residential parking spaces, but decided to require that all the existing storefront spaces be left for small businesses instead of setting aside a corner section for the retail chain. Owner Lee appealed the restriction five days later, saying Walgreens will not commit to the "awkward, L-shaped layout'' with no street exposure.

The plot thickened at the end of October, when city prosecutors filed charges against former Planning Commission President Hector Chinchilla, who allegedly accepted roughly $20,000 as a consultant to the project sponsor. Although Chinchilla was excused during the June votes on the project, the district attorney characterizes his participation in this as well as two other planning deals as a violation of misdemeanor conflict-of-interest laws.

Now seven new planning commissioners have been impaneled and begun meeting under San Francisco's voter-approved experiment with power-sharing between the mayor and Board of Supervisors, each of who appointed some of the incoming members.

This week, the supervisors could take a variety of actions, according to an aide: They could grant Lee's appeal to allow Walgreens a storefront space, uphold Green's decision as written, modify it, or reject the entire project approval. Another possibility might be some sort of referral to the newly appointed Planning Commission, since the approval came during a period when no such commission was available.

Instant Insights /

City Set to Decide on Walgreens in Excelsior District

Related Stories

Recommended For You