Courtesy of T.Dallas/Shutterstock.com

After several weeks of restrictive measures implemented to mitigate the effects of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic—including the closure of non-essential businesses and orders to “shelter in place”—business owners are increasingly being required to make difficult decisions in the face of significant liquidity shortfalls. In particular, commercial tenants are weighing the decision to abandon premises they lease or to withhold rent due to their landlords, which decisions raise a number of legal issues. Tenants have considered various legal theories to support rent abatement and lease termination claims, though at this point in the process, many tenants have come to agreement with their landlords on interim relief.

Negotiated Settlements

As a consequence of the substantial, in some cases complete, loss of revenues for many tenants, commercial landlords have generally taken a pragmatic approach, which is also driven by limited access to the courts and a perception that courts will not be sympathetic to any attempt to evict tenants based on pandemic-related defaults. Another factor for landlords is the belief that it will be quite difficult to replace an existing tenant in this environment.

Many commercial landlords and tenants have agreed to modify the terms of their leases in order to provide short-term relief to tenants, especially those in the retail sector. Among other things, parties have agreed to (i) short-term (e.g., 30-90 day) rent deferrals, with deferred rent to be repaid either in lump sums or in installments with varying repayment terms, (ii) short-term rent reductions, (iii) lease extensions coupled with free rent to commence now (so called “blend and extends”), (iv) negotiated lease terminations (often for stipulated sums), and (v) some combination of the foregoing. Landlords typically prefer to defer rent (even if forgiven at a later date) rather than grant an abatement to preserve the landlord’s claim in a bankruptcy of the tenant.

Legal Theories for Lease Terminations and Rent Abatements

In the absence of a negotiated agreement, commercial landlords and tenants should carefully review their leases to determine whether a tenant has the explicit contractual right to terminate its lease or withhold rent. If none exists and the tenant is unable to – or for strategic reasons elects not to – abide by the terms of the lease, the tenant may try to assert a common law defense to non-payment or abandonment.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.