BOSTON-The Boston Redevelopment Authority offered a compromise plan for the Fan Pier Project on the city’s waterfront after the state’s Office Of Environmental Affairs insisted on radical changes to the original proposal. Developer Nicholas Pritzker of Chicago accepted the changes weeks after insisting that he would back out of the project rather than reduce its size.

The city’s proposal involves reducing the size of Building H, one of Fan Pier’s main waterfront buildings, making it residential and adding civic space in two of the buildings. The proposal falls short of state Secretary of Environmental Affairs Robert Durand’s demand to eliminate Building H altogether.

“We wanted a greater view corridor of the water,” says Doug Pizzi, press secretary for the Office of Environmental Affairs. “We thought getting rid of building H was the easiest way to do that. What they came back with was not another way to do that.” Pizzi tells that his office has not signed off on the compromise plan yet. “We want more details on what this entails in terms of density of the project,” he notes. “We’re still going through negotiations.”

The Fan Pier Project, the city’s largest waterfront development plan in Boston’s history, was originally to be developed on 3.3 million sf of land. Under Secretary Durand’s revision the plan was cut down to approximately 2.7 million sf of land. The compromise plan cuts the project down to a little over 3 million sf of land.

The project has faced more than two years of review by various agencies and although Pritzker’s spokeswoman did not return calls before presstime, Pritzker is reported to have demanded that Durand finish his review by mid-November. Durand is expected to make a decision in the next several weeks, not only on Fan Pier but also on a sweeping city plan for redeveloping South Boston’s waterfront.

Pritzker’s troubles still might not be over then. The Conservation Law Foundation is reported to have threatened to sue stating that even after the compromise proposal on Fan Pier, the project is too big and that its buildings would wall off the waterfront.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.


Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join now!

  • Free unlimited access to's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including and

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.