WatsonCogeneration Co. v. County of LA,
The Court also based its rationale on the fact that the powerplant was developed as a result of favorable government incentives.Therefore, the Court held that it was appropriate for the assessorto consider the effect of the power contract on the plant's actualincome stream.
This case marks a considerable departure from the general ruleexcluding intangible rights and assets, such as above-marketcontracts, from assessment and may open the door to furtherinclusions.
Continue Reading for Free
Register and gain access to:
- Breaking commercial real estate news and analysis, on-site and via our newsletters and custom alerts
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the property casualty insurance and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?
Sign In Now
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.