DALLAS-As the Texas Transportation Commission gets its hands on the Department of Transportation’s proposal to limit construction of frontage roads on some future projects, the Dallas real estate industry braces itself for the commission’s response to this very sore subject. Issues of access and congestion are the major points of contention for those involved.

The Department of Transportation contends its proposal is designed to improve the ease of driving on state highways, as well as enhance safety for drivers on those passages. “The plan would not affect existing frontage roads,” department spokesperson Gaby Garcia tells GlobesSt.com.

“Our position is you shouldn’t have a one-size-fits-all policy,” North Central Texas Council of Governments transportation director Michael Morris says. “Maybe in rural areas, you may well want to restrict frontage roads, and on toll roads we restrict access, but it’s wrong to that they’re never a positive thing. That’s what we’re trying to sort out.”

Skeptics are concerned the proposal would lead to greater traffic snarls down the road, and limited access to hot commercial properties. And detractors are seeking details on areas in which these frontage roads will be restricted, and how much flexibility the proposal will allow for planned but not-yet-constructed roads.

“Frontage roads help access,” explains Bill Becker, senior director for the Dallas office of real estate services firm Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. “If you do away with them, it could negatively impact development in those areas.”

Eliminating frontage roads is a sore subject in the real estate industry, he concedes. “It’s something that people in commercial real estate don’t like to discuss a lot because it could potentially effect the value of land.”

The Dallas Chamber of Commerce is still crafting its stance on the proposal’s potential passage. “The Chamber really doesn’t have a position on that yet,” director of media relations Brandon Gallop says. “It’s fairly new–it’s only been out there for about a month, and we have not developed a position statement on that yet.”

If the Transportation Commission approves the proposal, it will then conduct a series of six public hearings in January. After those hearings, it will either amend the proposal veto it, or make it a policy.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.


Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.