SAN FRANCISCO-The City of San Francisco is hedging its bets with regard to 80 Natoma St., concurrently negotiating with property owner Jack Myers while also setting the stage for eminent domain proceedings should negotiations fail. Myers has approval for a 423-unit residential tower on the property, but the city believes it needs the property in order to expand and improve its Downtown regional public transit hub, the Transbay Terminal.City Supervisor Chris Daly introduced a resolution this week that will allow the board to vote on condemnation as soon as mid-August, should it come to that. An eminent domain vote requires approval by eight of the 11 supervisors. Meanwhile, Steve Legnitto, director of property for the real estate division of the city’s Department of Administrative Services, has sent a letter to Myers with an offer for the property, initiating a dialogue that could lead to a sale outside of the condemnation process, though Myers has said publicly the property is not for sale.Legnitto declined to reveal the size of the offer in the letter, though published reports have estimated that the city would make an offer in the $30-million range. Myers’ attorney, Michael Coffino, said he is preparing a written response to Legnitto, but declined to summarize it for GlobeSt.com until his client has approved it.Concurrently, Myers has filed two lawsuits against the city regarding his development. The first claims the environmental impact report for the Transbay Terminal project is inadequate because it does not take note of his building plans. Coffino says the importance of the lawsuit is that he believes the city cannot condemn any property with respect to the Transbay project until it has an adequate EIS.The second suit charges the city with selective enforcement of permit rules when it suspended work at the 80 Natoma site on June 7 following a complaint alleging the permits weren‘t valid because a prior owner hadn‘t followed the rules. In addition to setting aside the suspension, the suit asks for unspecified damages. A motion to stay the work suspension order is scheduled to be heard August 12 in state Superior Court.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

 

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.