X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

PHILADELPHIA-The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has a couple of busy months ahead. It has filed a suit with the State Supreme Court challenging an ordinance passed by the city council to put the location of the city’s two approved casino locations to a vote. In an unrelated matter, it has issued an update regarding eligibility for slots licenses at existing resorts and set April 20 as the opening day for applications.

In the court filing, PGCB asks for an emergency review of the city council’s ordinance, which, as GlobeSt.com previously reported, asks voters in the May 15 primary to decide on a change in the city charter that would prohibit casino development within 1,500 feet of a residence, school or certain other neighborhood properties. The PGCB suit petitions the court to remove the referendum from the ballot.

It cites portions of the state’s gaming act that give the board sole discretion over the location of slots facilities. It also charges, “the threatened operation of the ordinance causes harm on a statewide basis [and] the referendum has no legal effect because it addresses matters of statewide concern beyond the powers of the city council” under the state constitution.

In a statement, PGCB chairman Tad Decker says “Losses to citizens due to delays in opening the two Philadelphia slots facilities would be $140 million every six months, tax revenues that can never be regained.” He adds, “Placing this question on the ballot is a waste of time and taxpayer dollars.”

In response, Casino-Free Philadelphia, an organization that was instrumental in obtaining the city council’s passage of the referendum, charges, “Our right to vote is under attack by an out of control board.” Daniel Hunter, the organization’s coordinator, says, “Here we have the PGCB doing the casino’s dirty work.” Locations for SugarHouse and Foxwoods, the two casinos granted licenses by the board, do not conform to the referendum’s limitations.

As this plays out in court, PGCB proceeds with a second round applications for the state’s two remaining gaming licenses. These Category 3 licenses apply to “well-established resorts.” The definition of that phrase and other regulations that apply to this category came into question following the withdrawal of applications by Nemacolin Woodland Resort and Seven Springs Mountain Resort.

Consequently, the board amended the regulation for this category to allow the inclusion of “timeshares offered for rent to the general public” in the 275-room count, which is required. It also loosened the rules regarding how much a resort guest must spend on non-gaming amenities before gaining access to the gaming floor. The application period that begins on April 20, remains open for 60 days.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Unlimited access to GlobeSt and other free ALM publications
  • Access to 15 years of GlobeSt archives
  • Your choice of GlobeSt digital newsletters and over 70 others from popular sister publications
  • 1 free article* every 30 days across the ALM subscription network
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM events and publications

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.