X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

LOS ANGELES—A recent reversal on an EIR judgment regarding a residential-development project shows that analysis of greenhouse-gas emissions’ impact on climate change is complex and can hinder deals and development, Arthur Coon, shareholder and co-chair of Miller Starr Regalia‘s land-use practice group, tells GlobeSt.com. In a 5-2 decision filed November 30, the California Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which had upheld the EIS/EIR for the controversial Newhall Ranch development project. The high court approved the EIS/EIR’s methodology analyzing the significance of the project’s greenhouse-gas emissions in terms of reductions from projected “business as usual” emissions consistent with AB 32′s statewide reductions mandate, rather than against some absolute numeric limit above the project site’s “baseline” emissions. However, it held the GHG analysis lacked supporting substantial evidence and a cogent explanation correlating the project-specific reductions to AB 32‘s mandated statewide reductions so as to demonstrate consistency with the latter’s goals under the approved methodology.

GlobeSt

Join GlobeSt

Don't miss crucial news and insights you need to make informed commercial real estate decisions. Join GlobeSt.com now!

  • Free unlimited access to GlobeSt.com's trusted and independent team of experts who provide commercial real estate owners, investors, developers, brokers and finance professionals with comprehensive coverage, analysis and best practices necessary to innovate and build business.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and GlobeSt events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including ThinkAdvisor.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join GlobeSt

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.